3 Legged Thing Punks Tripods Discussions | Drop

Free Standard Shipping in the US on orders over $99

Showing 1 of 22 conversations about:

Nov 28, 2017

Hey, Most of your questions are answered in the product information. Just sayin.
One usability aspect that became relevant for me recently was how high a tripod can go. When taking photos of a beautiful high peaks sunset I couldn't extend my existing tripod high enough to get around the obstruction. When it comes to height the shorter version that's more convenient for travel. The weight is the same. Travis - 17.7" Folded Corey - 13.7" Folded
There are pros and cons on both sides.
Travis - can carry 40 lbs Corey - can carry 30 lbs
I usually try to purchase future proof products i.e. more leading edge so that it doesn't get obsolete as quickly. Yes, I understand we're talking about tripod/monopod here, but I'm thinking that it's possible that the weight limit at the higher end will allow for more flexibility in the long run. I can probably live with the 17 " length after all if it doesn't go tall enough to get the shot you want or need then who cares if it's 3" shorter, right?
Where would I begin using heavier weights on my tripod. FYI I do plan to purchase a 400mm for my potential work and I know the newest models are lighter, but these type of setups (the lens of course, and other accessories) probably increase the weight right?
I'd like to hear from your experience whether you have had this problem and how you solved or your professional/amateur opinions too.
Thanks in advance.
Scott

DonaldC

Nov 29, 2017

Happily-MeAfter some considerations that similar as yours, I chose the Travis due to it’s height. I will use the “one leg” feature in some conditions (low light, not enough spaces...etc), I am not sure the max length of that feature, but seems the Travis’ higher height is more convenient for me. And Travis’ 4 section legs and 1 section column seems more sturdier than Corey. ;-)

BF_Hammer

717

Jun 1, 2019

Happily-MeJust expanding on this discussion a little: What I constantly find with my tripods is that I want the legs to be longer so I can have the camera at head height without losing stability. Extending a center column is a cheap way to get extra height but it is done at the cost of a less-stable platform. Longer legs also allows having a broader stance to keep things in place under a wind-load. My example is working with a DSLR and a long telephoto zoom lens set to point generally upward to photograph the moon or some deeper-sky astrophotography subjects. A too-short tripod is a literal pain in the back from constant bending over or squatting down at the knees. And even if the camera+lens is much lighter than the rated load limit, factor in hanging a stabilizing weight under the column for that load limit. In other words, you will develop a poor opinion of the usefulness of a tripod if you don't buy enough tripod to begin with. I wish manufacturers would advertise the real leg length along with maximum height as it would help to decide. But those short-legged unstable tripods would need more discounts to sell if that happened.

Vote

View Full Discussion

Company

About Drop Studio Student Discount Privacy Policy Terms of Use Cookie Settings

Drop Refurbished

Like-new products you can trust

Drop Rewards

Get $5 for every 500 points you earn! Learn more

Drop Keyboard Club

Become a member and expand your keycap collection

Collaborate With Us

For Brands & Designers

Support

Contact Community Guidelines Help Center Sitemap

Follow Drop