Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
BagOfBeans
4
Sep 24, 2018
checkVerified Buyer
The headphones are advertised to have a lot of low end, but (at least mine) have barely any! listening to songs on my 200$ non-returnable and not what I expected when I ordered is maddening. when I say no low end I mean none. if I play a song with bass or a headphone test all I hear is rattling and static. NOT WORTH IT go buy some audio technical ATH M50X headphones. they are infinitely better. ps. the headphones are very bad build quality, almost all plastic and squeaky.
pps. the only plus is that they're so F**king huge they'll fit on literally anyone's head
Kaiwyn
6
Oct 1, 2018
BagOfBeansHas to be an obvious troll
BagOfBeans
4
Oct 3, 2018
KaiwynI wish. I wasted 200$ the sound quality is ok but there's no low end and the build quality is trash
Kaiwyn
6
Oct 4, 2018
BagOfBeansYou ever wonder if your product was just faulty? I used K7xx for bout 5 months and thought they were good and very comfortable, never had a problem with quality
postwarscars
1367
Jan 8, 2019
BagOfBeansAre you playing these through an amp? The k7XX series is pretty power hungry and a phone or computer output won't be sufficient to get the most out of them. They are notorious for their performance scaling with better gear. The Audio Technica ATH-M50s are heavy on low end, comparatively. These aren't for someone who wants overwhelming bass, they're still open back headphones. Still, they have good, realistic bass levels on proper gear and this is coming from a guy who owns some Audeze headphones.
chris68790
3
Feb 6, 2019
BagOfBeansYou obviously got a lemon, you can file a claim and they will send you another one unless you have a habit of trolling massdrop
PRODUCTS YOU MAY LIKE
Trending Posts in Audiophile