Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
USMCx0311
4
Sep 21, 2016
A basic G-Shock outshines this is on so many levels, it isn't even a question on what you should buy.
USMCx0311Hi USMCx0311, do you have a G-Shock?
Techdude154
0
Sep 21, 2016
USMCx0311I have a basic G-Shock, they are completely different watches. I don't see how the G-Shock outshines it.
USMCx0311
4
Sep 21, 2016
ArmourLiteYes (@ArmourLite) I currently wear the G-Shock GW-7900B. It is an excellent, yet cheap, sports watch. Now, I realise that the Tritium is analog, and the G-Shock is digital, however, some of the differences I would like to point out, are as follows. The G-Shock regularly receives atomic clock accuracy signals, which guarantees it will always be the most accurate time (in relation to the planetary rotation). The G-Shock also boasts extremely durable construction, and element resistance. Combined with the low-profile, stealth display, this watch is especially great for operators in the field like me. The solar powered technology is great, making battery replacement irrelevant. Now, I have not personally reviewed your watch, but will be very happy to in the future. I hope these points will influence you in improving your tech!
USMCx0311G-Shock definitely makes great watches! We have nothing but respect for them. However, G-Shock watches are in an entirely different category from tritium illuminated watches. The main advantage of the tritium is the ability to see the time in any lighting condition without having to press a button or activate luminescent paint with a flashlight. Many of our customers in the MIL/LE community can attest that when having to check the time in critical situations, they usually don't have another hand free to press a button to turn on a light. It's like comparing a Ford F100 to a Tesla that never needs fuel. The tritium is alway on and ready to be seen. Whereby the lights in the G-Shock need battery power and a press of a button for activation. In the case of a solar powered watch like your model, you need to make sure you have access to solar power. With the tritium, no fuel source is needed. I would definitely invite you to give an ArmourLite or Isobrite watch a try. We've outfitted Operational Members of all the branches of the Armed Forces and they absolutely swear by the tritium technology! I'm confident you'll love the technology as well. :-)
Okanaganguy
78
Sep 21, 2016
USMCx0311Old Skool vs. New
USMCx0311
4
Sep 22, 2016
ArmourLiteI did find the illumination aspect fairly interesting. I really like the idea of a constantly viewable faceplate, but I am concerned about the disadvantages. If the watch stays constantly visible it will enable the wearer to easily access, and see the current time reading. However, if the watch is giving off light, then it is visible not only to the wearer, but to all. So, while only being a minor disadvantage, it still makes a difference in deciding the best watch for a covert mission. I really like your choice of this innovative technology though!
Secondly, I noticed that you had brought up a great point about push-button illumination. It is a great disadvantage to have to active electroluminescent watches. But one of the things that I like about my watch is that it offers a gyro-activated setting. This means that the wearer only has to lift his/her hand up to viewing angle, and it activates the electroluminescence, similar to your watch.
Going on to the power situation, the tech of your watch is a great selling point, due to the fact you never need to worry about power. The G-Shock runs on not only solar, but any form of light energy. Making it chargeable anywhere. Another thing it offers, is an astounding 23 month lifespan without ever receiving light. Which, will probably never happen. This was a great selling point for me, because I know that wherever I am, there will be light. And if light means power, and power means access the ultra accurate timing, then it is a great feature. Since analog watches need servicing every few years to remain accurate, I feel that from a survivor aspect, a watch that doesn't require servicing is a better option.
Okay, now don't get me wrong, the timepiece that you have created is extremely nice, and worth anyones consideration! BUT, going back to my main argument, a basic G-Shock will perform just as well, for a fraction of the price. Now, I say this only from a survivor's viewpoint. If I were to consider what timepiece to purchase in the event of a total global collapse, I would be looking for one that is durable, accurate, flexible, reliable, long-lasting, and a bang for your buck. The Tritium meets those needs, except it is a bit costly for what is is. If I remember correctly, you marketed it as $249? Whereas a simple G-Shock can be purchased for only $50.
Once again, you have a great timepiece here, but it could be drastically improved with a few changes. Overall, congrats on your release!
USMCx0311
4
Sep 22, 2016
OkanaganguyNot necessarily, they are both fairly new technologies.
jessewaldo
69
Apr 16, 2017
USMCx0311As a G-Shock owner, here's a thumps up on your response. Spot on.
schaynes
2
Apr 16, 2017
USMCx0311g shock watches are crap, sorry to say suunto puts them to shame all day. these are even far more nice.
unoriginal
4
Apr 18, 2017
USMCx0311you're really comparing a gschock to an Armour lite with an automatic movement? Dude get over yourself. You're whole argument is pointless simply because the people looking to buy g schocks aren't looking to buy this. Those looking to buy this are SPECIFICALLY looking for an automatic timepiece, not a digital one. Therefore, they're already willing to pay extra for this feature. And you're really bringing costs into this argument? Do you not know what type of community the watch enthusiast are? You're argument that " you marketed it as $249? Whereas a simple G-Shock can be purchased for only $50 " applies to every single watch out there, including casio's higher priced g schock range. Gschocks are good? Yea, but they don't have the defining mechanical features this watch possess. Also Tritium which is used in so many other watches are incredibly difficult/impossible to see past a meter and are standard in firearms.