Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 7 conversations about:
MswmSwmsW
125
Aug 13, 2017
bookmark_border
that's a lot of money for an 18k vph, non-hacking watch, isn't it?
Aug 13, 2017
dholik8503
Aug 13, 2017
bookmark_border
MswmSwmsWDepends on your preference/how you budget/value your watch purchases, I think: 1) hacking versus non-hacking is not important to me--just my preference; 2) as far as lo-vph versus high vph, it's a complex topic, here are some links to discussions. Enjoy! http://www.watchtime.com/reference-center/glossary/vibration-vph/ http://forums.watchuseek.com/f6/21600-vph-good-bad-average-192055.html https://www.rolexforums.com/archive/index.php/t-184679.html https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/accuracy-what-is-it-and-does-anyone-actually-care
Another reference: there was a drop for a Maurice Lacroix retrograde watch a while ago, and there was an extensive discussion in the community regarding lo-vph versus high-vph with a number of references and opinions. My opinion is: the design of the watch completely outweighs the vph issue---if I love the design/price of a watch I will purchase regardless of the vph. Just my opinion, nothing else. If anything, reading about this is really neat for me, I am a watch lover.
Aug 13, 2017
View Full Discussion