DVDO Air3C Wireless HD Adapter

Name: DVDO Air3C Wireless HD Adapter
Brand: DVDO
SKU: dvdo-air3c-wireless-hd-adapter

Where's the price?

To negotiate the best possible price for our customers, we agree to hide prices prior to logging in.

12 requests

Product Description

Ideal for wall mounts and modern home theaters, the DVDO Air3C rids your home TV setup of wire clutter without sacrificing audio and video quality. By drawing power from the TV and AV source, it transmits uncompressed HD audio and video from up to 30 feet away Read More

Sort by: Newest

Jul 5, 2017

From the manufacturers website the output specs are up to 1080p60, 3D, and 7.1 surround sound. The 60Ghz they speak of sounds like AD wireless so it will not travel through objects. Have a look of YouTube for videos of the signal being blocked by people walking between devices.

Pritolus

Jul 5, 2017

MicroFibreManI was thinking the same thing. 60GHz means tons and tons of bandwidth overhead, but the devices need near line of sight. I wouldn't expect this to work through a wall, but if both sender and receiver are in the same room and elevated at least a meter off the floor I believe it should work fine. The tests I saw of the AD wireless was with objects very close to either sender, but with more room in between there should be much less of a problem. I'd say you need at least a meter of free space from either end before any potential obstacle.

Pritolus

Jul 5, 2017

MicroFibreManTheir product brief shows the receiver mounted on top of the TV, and I would expect they recommend the sender be placed at a similar height.

Pritolus

Jul 5, 2017

Zero latency is literally impossible. I'd love to see the real numbers.

View 6 More Replies

Karnat

156

Jul 6, 2017

Didn't think of that. It's probably not a big conversion since hdmi is easily packetable. But yeah it still takes up time.

Vote

Pritolus

Jul 6, 2017

KarnatYes. There is a good chance the latency is completely insignificant, but I'd feel a lot more confident in that if they'd share some actual numbers. Saying it's zero when that isn't actually possible just makes me sceptical...