Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 49 conversations about:
Aleskb
449
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
Any idea on the lug to lug with this watch?
Sep 4, 2017
claude-r
15
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
Aleskb@Aleskb: I checked for the lug to lug measure everywhere on the web but I could not find it. So I made a paper copy of the photo of the watch and using a ruler I measured both the 42mm dial and the lug to lug and I calculated that the lug to lug is exactly 50mm. This makes sense since I already own a 42mm Glycine Combat Sub which has a lug to lug of 50mm. It is border line on my 6.5 inch wrist. I did not want to buy another watch that is more than 40mm but I really like this blue Glycine chronograph; I still have 3 days to decide to cancel it or not.
Sep 4, 2017
Aleskb
449
Sep 4, 2017
bookmark_border
claude-rThanks for this Claude, very helpful! Indeed, 50 lug to lug makes sens for a 42 mm watch, it's also I believe the measurements of the Eterna Kontiki, while the Blumo with its 44mm has a 52 mm lug to lug I think.
I have the exact same issue as you, a wrist sitting somewhere between 6.5 and 6.7 inch, and a recent decision to try not to buy watches above 41 when possible. I made an exception for the Glycine Airman DC-4 as it's such a specific watch, I'll never find anything like it in the 40s. But with chronographs, I feel there are plenty of options in the 38-40mm range, even though slightly more expensive.
So I'll personnally skip on this drop, add a couple of hundreds and buy a Stowa Flieger with blued hands and a manual movement for now. It will tick the "flieger", "German" and "manual winding" boxes in my collection. I'll wait a little longer for a chrono, as I'm currently torn between saving to get a 2000-2500 one, at which price point there are many options, or go for a more reasonable Sea-Gull 1963, which is a beautiful mechanical chronograph with lots of history at around 300 USD. Quite tempted by that last option, but will (I think) go with the flieger first. And leave this Glycine behind ;)
Sep 4, 2017
MetalBeard
89
Sep 5, 2017
bookmark_border
AleskbI have the 43mm sport version of that Stowa Flieger. Love that watch. I very tempted for this one as well though. I think I'll wait for this to drop again, and possibly see the real life pictures first. It's too much of price for pulling a trigger blindly.
Sep 5, 2017
jamato8
188
Sep 5, 2017
bookmark_border
AleskbI have the 1963. A very nice watch. Get comments on it even though I wouldn't think people would notice it.
Sep 5, 2017
Aleskb
449
Sep 5, 2017
bookmark_border
MetalBeardThanks for this MetalBeard. So you confirm the Stowa is worth the extra mile (and USD) versus cheaper brands like Junghans and others if I want to get a flieger? They cost about the double depending on the chosen options, so I hope I won't be paying all this money just for the "historical" heritage of Stowa (even though it does count to me), but also for very enjoyable quality and finish?
It's important for me to know, as I'm still hesitant between the Stowa at 40mm and an Oris diver 65 with the deep blue dial. Two totally different watches, I know, but with a similar pricing range, and both I hope representing a step-up compared to my current small line-up (Seiko Alpinist SARB017, Seiko Blumo, Glycine Airman DC-4 Purist). I'll probably own both one day, but have to decide with which to go first!
Sep 5, 2017
Aleskb
449
Sep 5, 2017
bookmark_border
jamato8Thanks for this jamato. Where did you buy yours? One thing that makes me hesitant to pull the trigger is that there seems to be different "unofficial" versions and manufacturers out there. I'd really like to have a real Sea-Gull for the historical and collectible heritage, but want a see-through case-back to be able to admire that gorgeous Venus movement. The only models I have seen on the Sea-Gull web page are with closed case backs.
So I'm stuck there: finding an original Sea Gull 63 at 38 mm (not attracted by the 42 mm reissues) with a see-through case-back. Eh no easy!
Sep 5, 2017
jamato8
188
Sep 5, 2017
bookmark_border
Sep 5, 2017
MetalBeard
89
Sep 11, 2017
bookmark_border
AleskbSorry for the late reply, bud. I really like the flieger watches and in my quest to find something affordable, I came across two brands.. Stowa and Laco. Both are reputable brands and have a lot of history behind them. I didn't want a cheap watch, and I also didn't want to break the bank (IWC!). Considering all that, I talked to people at Stowa about the production, and quality control. Not that there isn't information on blogs or youtube, but I just like to research when I'm buying expensive stuff. These guys were really helpful and explained all the details. I bought the 43mm sport version (curved lugs), without logo, plus date. The smaller version is more on the original design (still comfortable to wear), but I don't like watches smaller than 42mm as a personal choice.
search

search
If I'm gonna buy the Type B dial, I'd go with Laco this time. Just for a change, and they also have a thing where they 'age' the watch for you. Every watch is handled by a single watchmaker throughout the production, and therefore, every watch has a unique characteristic.

https://www.laco.de/en/watches/pilot-watches-original/pilot-watch-paderborn-erbstueck
and here's an overview of their flieger watches. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axVR2-2-G4Y
PS. ETA all the way. Higher in price, but more reliable.
Sep 11, 2017
AlveusHuxley
8
Mar 1, 2018
bookmark_border
Mar 1, 2018
Aleskb
449
Mar 3, 2018
bookmark_border
MetalBeardThanks for this metalbeard. I did pull he trigger in the end, have it since a couple of months now and love it. My review is here https://smalltoysforgrownmen.wordpress.com/2018/02/05/stowa-flieger-baumuster-a-review/
Mar 3, 2018
View Full Discussion