Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
johnnyjohnny
132
May 6, 2018
really a beautiful watch but with 2 major problems:
1. they like to use the term 'combat' which carries with it SOME responsibility. having a 'combat' chronograph with subdial & seconds hands that have NO lume is IMO potentially fraud if you ask me. the hour/minute hands as it is have so little lume it is merely a decoration. 2. in the same vein, calling this a 'combat' watch when it has the same water resistancy as a dress watch is mystifying. what type of combat are we talking about, chess in the park?
it's simply a lovely watch, gorgeous classic design, but misstating (nice term for not telling the truth) about what you're getting to fool people into thinking they're getting a different category timepiece is not cool. i'm a big fan of glycine quality, heritage and designs, but they're marketing dept. is better off in the used car industry.
as a note, i have recently purchased a glycine combat sub aquarius diver, now THAT's a combat watch, as are their normal combat subs. as said, love the brand, but the marketing is, in my personal opinion, off the mark on this watch. they may think using 'classic' in the name gets them off the hook, but i know of no vintage 'combat' chronos that had unlumed hands unless you go back before the 50s or thereabouts, and this case style is clearly a 7750 chrono design from the 70s (when the movement came into being)...so by its own 'classic' definition, the lume issue fails.
sorry to put a sour note on what is a very nice watch for the office.
tbjs
484
Mar 18, 2020
cornerstonetom
263
Mar 18, 2020
johnnyjohnnyThis is a pilot watch. Pilots have been known to engage in combat. Since they don't dive underwater, 50 ATM is more than sufficient, even if they have to bail out over the ocean. That depth rating equates to 165 feet. Even at half of that, 82 feet, I think you'd be safe with it a shower or swimming pool. I'm not sure how well the strap would fare. There's also combat on land. Not much need for water resistance save for dealing with the occasional downpour or profuse sweating concomitant with incoming fire. Combat is not strictly diving related. As far as appearance is concerned, it's different from a flieger. That may or may not be a good thing.
(Edited)
johnnyjohnny
132
Mar 18, 2020
cornerstonetomgood points but I"d say that if it's a pilot watch they'd need to match the line that real pilot's watches have. I collect vintage & current military, milsub and pilot's watches and compared to them this is indeed a dress watch. you are right about depth, i was showing my bias for milsubs. for this this watch one could always replace the hands of one wanted to read it in the dark. otherwise it is a nice piece.
johnnyjohnny
132
Mar 18, 2020
tbjsfunny. great minds thinking alike....had never seen that. thanks!
tbjs
484
Mar 18, 2020
cornerstonetomThen why not add it to the Airman line?
cornerstonetom
263
Mar 18, 2020
tbjsYou'll have to ask Glycine. One guess, "Combat" encompasses all aspects of the types of forces used. "Airman" does not necessarily imply a military role. Regardless, if a watch looks good to me, serves a purpose and works reliably, I'm good regardless of the name.