Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
seedeh
6
Aug 11, 2017
I wouldn't recommend buying this. The new one is updated with Invicta, a much cheaper brand, and it reflects on the updated watch. Take a look at the classic one and it's quality, the Invicta ones are not so much. It's worth the 50 extra dollars for the original one on like jomashop or something.
boozed
297
Aug 12, 2017
seedehHow can you judge quality just from these photos?
seedeh
6
Aug 12, 2017
boozedThey're the newer version, which are lesser quality. I'm not judging quality based on pictures, I'm just recognizing the quality of the watches.
Virgule
343
Aug 12, 2017
seedehInvicta is not designing or manufacturing Glycine watches. They're distributing them.
seedeh
6
Aug 18, 2017
VirguleThey still downgraded this version of the watch.
TigerUK
296
Nov 22, 2017
Virgulethey will be in charge of setting budgets on the manufacturing and that will bring down cost.
Virgule
343
Nov 22, 2017
TigerUKI'd be curious to read about this if you have a source.
ckm5
210
Jun 24, 2018
seedehI totally agree - I bought a Combat Sub a few months ago and it's nowhere near the quality of my older Combat 6. So bad I thought of returning it, but I gave it some wrist time to see if it was just me. Nope, it's on par with a cheaper Invicta - even Invicta's higher end models are better.