Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 21 conversations about:
PaigeD
522
May 18, 2018
bookmark_border
Sorry for the confusion regarding the specs. I've checked with the vendor and updated our drop page with the correct information. Thanks for calling these discrepancies out! @Christo @Flashman @chugger
May 18, 2018
chugger
May 18, 2018
bookmark_border
PaigeDUncoated: Weight: 4.5 oz (152 g) Coated: Weight: 4.6 oz (130 g)
I'm not sure which is right and which is wrong but... something still seems a little off.
May 18, 2018
PaigeD
522
May 18, 2018
bookmark_border
chuggerOops...it must be Friday or something! The ounces were updated, but not grams. I've updated them once again
May 18, 2018
chugger
May 18, 2018
bookmark_border
PaigeDTGIF :-)
May 18, 2018
Flashman
90
May 18, 2018
bookmark_border
PaigeDThanks for checking on the specs for the pan and updating !
May 18, 2018
foobar5
75
Jun 10, 2018
bookmark_border
PaigeDI just received mine, and it weighs a hair over 6.2 Oz... Fully 30%+ more than advertised. This is completely defective in scope of ultralight cookware. I'll also note that at least one other user has posted similar numbers.
How do I get a refund, and a prepaid label if someone wants this back?
Edit: this is the standard/non-coated, and the weight is just the pan, no bag.
Jun 10, 2018
Flashman
90
Jun 11, 2018
bookmark_border
foobar5Is that the non stick, or standard pan? Is 6.2 oz just the pan,.. not including the bag? If so, that is a bit heavier.
Jun 11, 2018
foobar5
75
Jun 11, 2018
bookmark_border
Flashman6.2+ ounces is _just_ the standard / NON-coated pan. no bag.
Jun 11, 2018
Flashman
90
Jun 11, 2018
bookmark_border
foobar5That's not right then. The reason people get this pan is for an ultralight pan,.. that is a substantial difference. A gram or so off in one thing, but that is a lot heavier.
Jun 11, 2018
View Full Discussion