Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
PaigeD
522
May 18, 2018
Sorry for the confusion regarding the specs. I've checked with the vendor and updated our drop page with the correct information. Thanks for calling these discrepancies out! @Christo @Flashman @chugger
chugger
May 18, 2018
PaigeDUncoated: Weight: 4.5 oz (152 g) Coated: Weight: 4.6 oz (130 g)
I'm not sure which is right and which is wrong but... something still seems a little off.
PaigeD
522
May 18, 2018
chuggerOops...it must be Friday or something! The ounces were updated, but not grams. I've updated them once again
chugger
May 18, 2018
PaigeDTGIF :-)
Flashman
90
May 18, 2018
PaigeDThanks for checking on the specs for the pan and updating !
foobar5
75
Jun 10, 2018
PaigeDI just received mine, and it weighs a hair over 6.2 Oz... Fully 30%+ more than advertised. This is completely defective in scope of ultralight cookware. I'll also note that at least one other user has posted similar numbers.
How do I get a refund, and a prepaid label if someone wants this back?
Edit: this is the standard/non-coated, and the weight is just the pan, no bag.
Flashman
90
Jun 11, 2018
foobar5Is that the non stick, or standard pan? Is 6.2 oz just the pan,.. not including the bag? If so, that is a bit heavier.
foobar5
75
Jun 11, 2018
Flashman6.2+ ounces is _just_ the standard / NON-coated pan. no bag.
Flashman
90
Jun 11, 2018
foobar5That's not right then. The reason people get this pan is for an ultralight pan,.. that is a substantial difference. A gram or so off in one thing, but that is a lot heavier.