Lenovo Curved NVIDIA G-Sync 144Hz Gaming Monitorsearch

Lenovo Curved NVIDIA G-Sync 144Hz Gaming Monitor

Lenovo Curved NVIDIA G-Sync 144Hz Gaming Monitor

bookmark_borderSave
Where's the price?
To negotiate the best possible price for our members, we must agree to hide our prices externally.


Add a comment...
I picked this monitor up when the drop was live a few weeks ago. I love it. Only down side is that it's 1080 but I don't really care to spend the money for 2k or 4k.
Please bring this back
GuyFromDubai
Its back!
B.Hutch
Yes it is!
too bad they cheaped out with 1080. i was about to buy :(
If only it was 1440p...
In the netherlands this one is 600 euros that is around 700 dollars
This monitor had terrible reviews on Amazon.
Trevlar
yeah i want to get it but people seem to hate it
Quick google search and I found for $289...
Sbellew
That's for the freesync version, i found the same. The gsync is a little above $300 from newegg
Do they have a 32" 2560x1440 144Hz VA/IPS panel with G-Sync at a less than $500 price point? I'd buy that. I haven't had a 1080p monitor since 2013, and I'm not going back just for extra frames and adaptive sync technology.
Load 5 more comments
I guess I should make my point clear: there's like 0.00001% of all PC users who has any need for gsync. So Nvidia couldn't care less about making it more affordable since it won't affect its bottom-line one bit, in fact, the opposite may be true.
Ghosting is just 1 of many issues I had with the Viotek monitor I bought and returned.
1080p? Barf. I'll wait for the Dell S2716dg to go on sale for $350 again. With how long Massdrop deal take to ship, if probably still get the Dell first
Load 4 more comments
Did you just say 4K? And at 1080p, I would be pulling well over 250 frames in OW. I can certainly hit 144 in almost every game if it is properly optimized. Shit, I’d probably hit close to 144 in Wildlands 1080p.
You also forget that graphics cards are not the problem at higher framerates and lower resolutions - the CPU bottleneck is usually what will hold you back in newer games.
You show all the characteristics of somebody who doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
shabbaranks
Hahaha, clearly I don't know what I'm talking about as you didn't read my original comment. Good luck getting anywhere close to 144fps in Wildlands at 1080p without lowering settings. At Medium-High settings, sure you'll average 125fps with dips into 90s but at Ultra you'll be struggling to maintain 60fps. And in 4K, you'll be in the 40fps with dips into the high 20's and low 30's. IDK why you're trying to turn this into an argument as I run benchmarks of my own on on every preset then use custom settings to get the best graphics while maintaining a decent framerate.
Obviously you'll be CPU bound at lower resolutions as the CPU has to process the frames. And the higher you go in resolution the more GPU dependent you become. Some people go for performance, others flat out go for visuals. Personally, I desire both as I mainly play in VR where 90fps is the minimum targeted framerate without ending up using ASW or Multiprojection, where your FPS is locked to 45fps and smoothed out to maintain somewhat of a decent experience.
A headphone stand near the bottom of the display? Would think they need to be higher up for most full sized cans. Would also rather have it on the right side for my current setup.
VA panel tho :/
Load 5 more comments
VA is capable of offering 1MS response times. If there is a VA option - I would never go with a TN panel. Unless you are on the pro scene there really is not reason to get a TN anymore unless you just can't afford the few extra for the VA.
Sbellew
Aye. Which is why I recommend avoiding TN and going VA.
If this was 1440p I'd be all over this. TBH my Dell 2716DG has been very solid in it's performance and pretty much no issues, especially when deep sleep mode is disabled.
Load 4 more comments
I have a sample on its way which I'm considering listing on Massdrop. Mainly because all the "IPS" monitors I could find were actually "IPS like" or G-Sync. I don't want a bloody g-sync monitor! 27", 2K, 144Hz, IPS (4ms) Freesync monitors are damn near impossible to find. And when I find them, they are $1300 NZD. I have a barebones one on the way that I've spec'd for my liking. Thin bezels, good I/O, for under $1000 NZD. But I'm not sure if ordering 500 of them would be a good idea if they didn't sell.
David3D
You really should check out the Nixeus EDG 27" for a FreeSync 1440p option with IPS technology. They even occasionally offer drops on MD here for it at very affordable pricing (sub-$500) and I bought it for $499 on Newegg when it first came out. Link here: https://www.massdrop.com/buy/nixeus-edg-27-ips-wqhd-freesync-144hz-monitor?utm_placement=1&referer=6PBM99&mode=guest_open&utm_campaign=Automated%20Daily%20Promotional%202018-04-27&utm_source=SparkPost&utm_medium=email&utm_term=Daily%20Promotional&utm_content=1524822073547.354870422634276439024560
Exact same monitor on sale at Newegg for the exact same price. Quite the deal here.......
Load 8 more comments
The only difference between the C1 on Newegg and BE on the drop is the C1 features lighting sync with Razer Chroma, which the BE does not. Same monitor as Newegg listing on Best Buy Business with 4ms listed as response: https://www.bestbuybusiness.com/bbfb/en/US/adirect/bestbuy;jsessionid=16867186832EBD4B047FD4331B899DF6.bstby2?cmd=catProductDetail&showAddButton=true&productID=BB20486730
zachisbad
The one you posted for sale at 300 is 8ms with different pn.
*You're
i like how in the title if it isnt 4k they wont mention the resolution and if it isnt 144hz they wont mention the refresh rate...
Dell S2417DG, same price, 100% better value for 2560x1440, G-Sync, 165 hz. Is this even a deal?
Load 7 more comments
Im coming from 50inches and 1080p 60Hz...24Inches is entirely too small after that... on top of that TN? No thanks..you can keep the 24inch TN nightmare. This Lenovo also suits my gtx 970 pretty good, if it was 1440p I would never get the fps I want. If I went 1440p I would need a new gpu to hit those fps all the way to 165Hz let alone the VRAM issue. And if I had the card to hit 160fps @ 1440p. I sure as hell am not buying a 24in TN panel LOL.
Resonat.e
Where is it the same price
So I had one of these but I returned it because of some screen issues that I will give a pass. I would really like to try this screen again but I have a few questions. Can we be guaranteed fresh warranties? The one I recieved had actually expired under warranty already somehow. And how long has Massdrop had these or when were they ordered?
Got all excited until I saw the resolution, dang. I want 1440p.
Load 1 more comment
DSpaceNine
I was thinking the exact same thing. If only this was a 2k monitor.
Panzerghost
This!
Yes
Why in the hell are we getting all of these "gaming" monitors that don't have 1ms response times?
Load 2 more comments
I'll grant you this monitor is an odd fit as 27" 1080p monitor, most panel's with these specs's tend to be TN (gaming monitors, which could get your 1ms response time) or non gaming monitors. That said I understand the niche they are trying to fill as there are some people such as myself who cannot stand the poor viewing angles, contrast, and color reproduction of a TN panel. I've used High refresh TN, VA, and IPS I don't this the 1 - 4ms makes a difference especially in multiplayer games were latency, ping, is going to cause more delay than input lag. That said I'm not sold on 1080p monitor at 27" inches for gaming it's perfectly acceptable(to potentially great if high refresh rate is really your thing), but I use my monitor for both productivity and gaming, the pixel density and screen real estate is a deal breaker for me because I want a monitor suited for both. But for many people this offers an affordable g-sync monitor that rock's a Samsung VA panel, which should hypothetically have nice contrast and good color accuracy without all of the drawbacks of a TN panel, which I would say are generally loathed by a large portion of the gaming community.
Also a TN panel at 27" inches you really need to be cognizant that you remain in the sweet spot because the size alone is going to cause color/contrast deviation. Look at the Asus Rog Swift the PG27Q is generally considered to be the best all around gaming monitor which is the IPS variant, there is also a TN variant but is less popular and receives less praise. Granted when it comes to monitors with similar specs it largely comes to down personal appearance and what your eye prefers (assuming your computer is capable of driving the monitor properly)
DCFORTI
Personally I use multiple monitors, one for gaming and one for productivity so I don't run into the issues of having drawbacks for certain things. I do understand where you're coming from though if you're trying to use a single monitor for multiple things. I think my biggest problem with this drop is that it is a pretty niche group, in my opinion, that would go for this monitor. Well I say that but I suppose there are some gamers out there who would go for this outside of that niche group, however, this really isn't the "gaming" type of monitor that most PC gamers are looking for. So why have it on MASSdrop?
Anyone in canada ordered this? Wondering what the final price might be once it crosses the boarder... also how is this shipped? Usps? Ups?
Sigh... "Lastly, when *you're* taking a break from your games..." There I fixed it.
Waiting for 34 inch monitors
AHuman
Wait for the massdrop "vast" to come back, it's insane for the price compared to others on the market
Would rather have a non-curved 1440p version. Can't seem to find a decent deal on that anywhere.
Wolfbane378
Me neither, let me know if you find one.
For a while https://www.amazon.com/AOC-AG271QG-Gaming-Monitor-G-Sync/dp/B01G5JYMNA was at $550. I hadn't yet built my PC and it had been that price for a while, so I figured there was no rush.
Then I built my PC and they upped the price and promptly sold out. I can't find a comparable monitor for a reasonable price now. They all seem to be ~$700.
It seems like all the 1440p 144hz "IPS" gsync monitors are based on 5 year old technology and have suffered from bad quality control issues from backlight bleed and more. Right now it seems like the manufacturing these monitors has either slowed or stopped, despite the fact that there is a huge demand and no new monitor line has taken up this niche.
Wolfbane378
If you don't need Gsync, Viotek's 27in 1440p 1440hz monitor is great. They produce MSI's monitors as well.
Bought this a week ago for $370... poop
Frizle
How you like it? hows the refresh rate?
Darkclow
I actually returned it because of a light bleed issue. I picked another one up for $300 though. I like it, it suites my checklist pretty good. / not tn / cheapest g-sync @ 27in / 1080p because my gtx 970 won't do 1440p that fast / the curve is ok, it isn't the most amazing thing but it doesn't bother me like I thought it might / I have mine on a monitor arm and I believe they are very worth it, the maneuverability is cool but I like the free deskspace a lot / it comes with a DP cable / i believe the bottom out refresh rate for g-sync is 48Hz .. I do notice this when games get down in there like GTA V - I just lower a setting so I don't go that low, it doesn't really feel very good to play those low fps anyways. The colors are ok, the panel seemed to test out ok on the lagom lcd test page, not spectacular but nothing was washed out, all gradients are visible, there is an ICC profile on Lenovo website and the included CD.
Finally g-sync. Shame I already got one.... Sorry Massdrop
Considered it, looked up some reviews, and saw it's not a quality made monitor. What I saw in common from some reviews is some cloudiness around some edges.
I have a 1060 6GB which means 1080p for me, but seems I'm going to have to wait until GPU prices go down and upgrade both card and 2K monitor. Here's hoping AMD gets their stuff straight by then so I don't have to spend an extra $200 for a GSYNC monitor.
Load 2 more comments
I think he means makes a competitive high end card
AMD makes freesync, exactly. GSYNC requires a proprietary chip in the monitor, which drives the price up. Freesync does not. The only problem is that AMD needs to make a better graphics card. Vega was bad for many reasons, so waiting for Navi might be a good idea, as you need a graphics card from AMD to use freesync.
buy it on ebay now with free shipping
Finally, a monitor for me!
> 1080p
Nooooooooooo
Load 17 more comments
"You're capable to complete" and "Your grammar doesn't look good" in the same sentence?
Platokrates
Think about it. If you wanted me to write "capable OF" then I would have to change complete to completing. It also isn't in the same sentence lol. Nice try though. If anything the biggest mistake was where I said "Read and write" would have sounded better as "reading and writing" but it still works.
Should I get this monitor? I got a 970 and am planning on upgrading it to the volta xx70 when it comes out. Or should I wait for a good deal on a 1440p 144hz monior?
Load 8 more comments
EndMe
Ultrawide monitors 34 inch or above are huge improvements. Either go for a 3440x1440p or if your worried about framerates and play alot of shooters 2560x1080 (you'll just run SAY when you want quality). Remember 34 in ultrawide is as tall as a 27". 29 inch ultrawide is about as tall as a 24" (a bit to short for me).
If you go for a 27 inch look at a 2k monitor not 4k unless your just doing graphic design stuff. It's to hard to push 4k and will remain that way at least another 2 gpu generations. 4k can be wxceptable just expect to turn settings down if you go that way. And if you go 4k and try and run it at 2k rez it just doesn't look good.
EndMe
Almost definitely 1440p. Im on a 980 ti and outgrew my 1080p monitors very fast. Currently waiting for some nice gsync 1440p 27" or 34" monitors to replace them with.