The 31MU97Z-B version, which adds 2 Thunderbolt 2 connections, is NOT fully Mac compatible. I displays 4k @ 60Hz via HDMI or DisplayPort/MiniDisplayPort, but it only does 4k @ 50Hz via Thunderbolt. Most Macs will only push out 4k @ 60 Hz - see https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202856.
On my mind 2015 Macbook pro, I can use the legacy display panel to force the graphics card to 50hz (Hold option while changing the resolution from 'display default' to 'scaled'). It works, but whenever I attempt to scale the graphic elements of the OS up or down (Retina/HiDPI mode) to make things bigger, it flips back to 60Hz and the display says 'no signal'.
Applecare confirms that this monitor is not compatible via thunderbolt. :(
johntrandallDang. I thought this was a front runner as the new monitor for my Mac. Maybe time to dive into the ocean of Korean 4K monitors but I'd want one that's true 4096 resolution, not 3860.
bradl001Well, I'm sure in a year or two koreans will flood the market with cheap 8Ks ;) As for right now, 42" IPS 4k for under $800 sounds fabulous. Much better dpi than this one, too :D
AnzialYeah but these cheap Korean monitors will also be of a lot lower quality. With those types of monitors there is almost always a few dead pixels on arrival and there will occur more over time. They are cheap but this will definitely be noticeable in quality.
SeinturierDon't be so dismissive. Ever seen one yourself? Their quality is no less than LG which is a Korean firm, BTW. Besides, it is LG, Samsung and Sharp panels which are used by those small Korean manufacturers. They make it cheap because they keep the monitors barebones and avoid extra fluff like USB hubs or articulating stands, or international marketing (they are designed for Korean market only). As for dead pixels, LG or any other major manufacturer does not guarantee their absence either. On the flip side, the cheap korean monitors may come in with 0 dead pixels, as well (see link below to the most recent report from a buyer of $700 4k 42" screen)
http://www.overclock.net/t/1565292/owners-crossover-434k-494k-10bit-ips-4k-uhd-dp-60hz-43-49/190#post_24288093
Oh, and BTW, the cheap korean monitors manufacturers are among the very first to employ PWMless of flicker-free backlights. Read on it below
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/articles/content/pulse_width_modulation.htm#side_effects
Please dont comment if you dont know what your talking about
4k= 4000 horizontal pixles (or more)
3840 is techincally 3.8k
What possibly makes you think more pixles in the same space is an "abomination"
SeinturierThis monitor isn't really meant for your average consumer. If you want a 4k monitor they're plenty of cheaper alternatives. This is meant for someone who needs/ wants 99.5% AdobeRGB and 12-bit color. If you don't want these things then go for the cheaper Korean or any other brand and if you do want these things then I recommend not cheaping out. It depends on your situation.
Google 4k. First link wikipedia. First sentence. "4K resolution, also called 4K, refers to a display device or content having horizontal resolution on the order of 4,000 pixels." if youre going to be that confident in being wrong at least cite your source
On my mind 2015 Macbook pro, I can use the legacy display panel to force the graphics card to 50hz (Hold option while changing the resolution from 'display default' to 'scaled'). It works, but whenever I attempt to scale the graphic elements of the OS up or down (Retina/HiDPI mode) to make things bigger, it flips back to 60Hz and the display says 'no signal'.
Applecare confirms that this monitor is not compatible via thunderbolt. :(
4k= 4000 horizontal pixles (or more) 3840 is techincally 3.8k What possibly makes you think more pixles in the same space is an "abomination"