Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
agooh
10
Nov 2, 2014
is this better than ASUS PQ321? also could someone please tell me is there a huge diff. between 1440,and 4k ? Thanks
DigiChaos
8
Nov 2, 2014
agooh1440 is referring to the the number of pixels high. This monitor is 3440x1440 and is wider than most monitors. It has an aspect ratio of 21:9.
4k is referring to the overall number of pixels on a screen. Usually the resolution is 3840X2160 and has an aspect ratio of 16:9.
xelf
11
Nov 2, 2014
agooh4k refers to the number of pixels wide (see below) 3840X2160 is 8,294,400 pixels. 3440x1440 is 4,953,600 pixels.
Despite 4K having almost double the number of pixels, the biggest visible difference is the ratio, the widescreen 21:9 is really going to stand out compared to the 16:9
Also, 4.9Mpixels is going to be a lot easy for most graphics cards to handle vs needing a hardware upgrade to run the 8.2Mpixels of a 4k monitor.
In my opinion (and actually that of many others too) you need a fairly large monitor to really appreciate a 4K monitor, 44" and bigger.
More on 4K as a marketing term to refer to 3840 X 2160: Technically, "Ultra High Definition" is actually a derivation of the 4K digital cinema standard. However while your local multiplex shows images in native 4096 x 2160 4K resolution, the new Ultra HD consumer format has a slightly lower resolution of 3840 X 2160
MrSpanky12
1
Nov 2, 2014
agoohIt depends entirely on what you want to use it for. If all you're doing is code or design work, 4k will give you more screen space, but for gaming 2k is probably your best bet because most 4k monitors are still capped at 30hz (looks like the one you mentioned is 60hz) and driving 4k pixels is insanely difficult and would require multiple GPUs. This monitor is really expensive compared to other 2k monitors because it is in a wider aspect ratio (21:9 vs 16:9), but is less than half the cost of that PQ321 (according to a quick google search).