Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 675 conversations about:
icannotfindagoodname
6
Sep 15, 2018
bookmark_border
Love the design. The only thing that puzzles me is why the the zippers couldn't go all the way up. A small gap in the velcro would have been sufficient, and also eliminate the need for a zipper garage. What were your considerations for the current vent design?
Sep 15, 2018
dandurston
5116
Dan Durston
Sep 15, 2018
bookmark_border
icannotfindagoodnameHi ICFAGN,
Here is a closer image of the top of the zipper area:
search
So the zipper can not continue because the main panel ends to form the vent. There is a strip of grosgrain that continues from the top of the zipper up to the peak (just out of sight in this picture) so that there is good tension along the zipper (making it run smoothly), but the panel ends so it wouldn't be possible to continue the zipper without a major redesign of the vent. I could have done a smaller vent for a slightly taller zipper, or partially blocked the vent by continuing more of the panel up to the top or located the vent elsewhere to get it even taller, but I think the larger vent located here is a good design because it flows air really well, it is very easy to operate from inside and outside the tent (a vent on the end panel would be hard to operate from inside), and it allows you to reach your arm through to insert the pole while pitching (see video).
I don't think you'll find that the main doors are hard to use because they are still quite large and tall. For comparison, the X-Mid fly zippers opens to be 42" tall while the MSR Carbon Reflex 1 (below) opens to about 33" tall - much smaller. That's an extreme example, but numerous tents have the vent positioned at the top of the fly door (TarpTent, SD High Route....many others) and almost all of the solo tents like are are shorter than the X-Mid, so I think you'll find entering the X-Mid to be substantially easier than average.
search
Or maybe I have completely misunderstood your question and you are wondering why the main zippers don't run through a gap in the velcro right to the top of the current panel. The answer to that is that this extra distance is quite small - you'll only get about an inch taller zipper because you need some space at the top to finish the seams. So the main zipper could be 1" taller in exchange for having a vent that doesn't fully seal. Arguably that is better but it's already quite a tall zipper and the difference would be small. I don't think you'd notice any difference in functionality.
Or perhaps you are suggesting that I simply don't stop the main panel but rather continue to it underneath the vent. This is what MSR has done with the Carbon Reflex 1 (see below) because they don't actually have a vent here. Rather what looks like a vent is just a flap to stop rain from falling in the door because they don't have a zipper (just clips). But as you can see, this panel would just end up blocking the vent when the door is closed. I'm surprised that MSR didn't make this a functional vent because they are so close already.
search
With regards to the zipper garage, there already isn't one (see first pic). The X-Mid fly zippers only have one slider because sliders are surprisingly heavy so most UL tents just spec one on the fly. This is especially true here because I have spec'd tougher #5 zippers where the sliders are much heavier than #3 sliders, so you don't want more than you need. This single slider naturally rests at the bottom of the zipper so you can properly open the door. So there is no second slider that rests at the top and needs a garage.
Sep 15, 2018
icannotfindagoodname
6
Sep 15, 2018
bookmark_border
dandurstonThanks for your extensive reply. What I actually had in mind was to extend the zip and small door up to the peak (indeed blocking the vent a bit, but it doesn't seem much from the picture) and having the larger door as it is now, but with a length of zip running to the peak (where the grosgrain is). That would allow the door to open fully. Nevertheless, I'm sure that your design is sufficiently large and has less chance of zipper snags. Looking forward to having the tent in my hands in May to take on a trip.
Sep 15, 2018
dandurston
5116
Dan Durston
Sep 15, 2018
bookmark_border
icannotfindagoodnameI believe you are suggesting something like this:
search

I certainly appreciate the suggestion and you taking the time to think about this. I think this would create issues with the strut though. If the door was unzipped, there wouldn't be taut fabric to support the bottom of the strut so the vent would be floppy when the door is open - perhaps that is okay because if the door is open you don't really need the vent anyways, but it might look unprofessional. A bigger issue is if the zipper went to the top and you rolled up the door, the bottom of the strut would interfere/get caught in that roll. In the picture below, imagine if there was a zip right to the top and how it would interfere with the bottom of the strut in terms of making it limp and interfering with rolling up.
search
A smaller issue is that the zipper would be a bit awkward to use in those upper 8" because your hand would have to go under the upper flap. Not a big deal but maybe a bit clumsy.
So I think the doors are working nicely as is, but if a longer zipper was desired the best approach may be to move the vent to the end wall. It is in it's current position because it's easier to use from inside the tent and because if I make a single/hybrid wall version some day it works with that too. With a single wall, a vent on the end wall would lead directly inside the sleeping area, so mesh would be needed in the vent (which hugely kills airflow) whereas on the door wall there would still be a mesh wall here so the vent would be outside of the sleeping area.
Sep 15, 2018
View Full Discussion