Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Jwinstonc
1
Apr 12, 2018
This looks very similar to the Patagonia R1. Same fabric from what I can tell. If so - it's a great pullover. Super comfortable and versatile as a mid-layer or over a tshirt in 50-60. Fit is slim in body/arms. Arms are decently long. Not sure if Rab version fits the same. Only downside- the face has pilled some and looks a little shabby now after about a year of occasional wear.
RossT
4
Apr 12, 2018
JwinstoncThe fabric used in this is the exact same fabric in the Patagonia Thermal Weight line, which is Polartec Power Grid High Efficiency (HE) @ 3.8 oz/sqy fabric weight.
The R1 is the regular Polartec Power Grid, and is the 6.8 oz/sqy fabric weight, which will be a lot warmer.
I'd say the temp range you mentioned, 50-60 degrees, is still accurate for this 3.8oz weight as an active layer, in case that helps anyone. I've never owned an R1 but I would imagine it would be suitable at 50-60 degree standing around in camp. But with this Rab, using the 3.8 oz HE fabric, just throw on a wind shell and you will drastically increase the thermal efficiency for colder active pursuits or those mild nights in camp.
Jwinstonc
1
Apr 13, 2018
RossTThanks for the reply and fabric info! Didn't realize there was a difference.
Yeah the 50-60 I mentioned on the R1 range was really more for around town wear. I've hiked in the R1 with a lightweight baselayer around 40-45 and been plenty comfortable. The Rab sounds great as a lighter weight layer. I recently picked up a Outdoor Research Ferrosi softshell that I really like. This Rab plus the OR would cover a pretty wide temp range.