Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
gdoteof
103
May 4, 2017
This mouse is 91% smaller than it's predecessor? Is this a mouse for ants?
Other than being microscopic, how is it different than the version of this mouse available for $60 right now on amazon?
gdoteofThis model is not available anywhere. This is the exclusive first launch of this product. It has the newest 3361 optical sensor.
gdoteof
103
May 4, 2017
Tex-ArozziNew sensor, got it. Is it really 91% smaller? That seems really, really unlikely.
gdoteofI do see your point about the 91%. We will get that updated.
gdoteof
103
May 4, 2017
Tex-ArozziI'd have gone with "9% smaller" rather than "91% as large" but this does make more sense.
gdoteofIn addition to what Brian has mentioned, the Kone Pure Owl Eye is also lighter with better weight distribution and features an improved surface texture (compared to the original Kone Pure).
crawlerin
3
May 4, 2017
gdoteofI wouldn't say ants, just people with smaller hands. Like ... women and younger populace? I am a female with smaller hands and shorter thumbs, using claw grip and ergonomic pad. Majority of gaming mice (and controllers too) available on the market are just big for me. I own already 3 pieces of existing Roccat Kone Pure because it fits my hand better than anything else (the wheel is moved a bit back = I can actually scroll, just the Forward button is still not comfortably reachable). If this is even smaller, I am starting to be very interested.
gdoteof
103
May 4, 2017
crawlerin@crawlerin the original description was that the mouse was 91% smaller, so the old one was ten times the size. Slightly smaller makes a lot of sense
crawlerin
3
May 4, 2017
gdoteofOh OK, I guess it was corrected since, and I read new description already :-)
Trending Posts in Battlestations