Sennheiser PC37X randomly goes bad after disconnecting the cable ?
Greetings, Yesterday I was using my headset like normal with my macbook, just listening to music and on a call with people like usual, and the headset was perfectly fine. The stock wire that came with the headset is extremely long and yesterday it annoyed me very much that it kept getting tangled with itself, so I decided to see if the cable is replaceable. I pulled out the cable from the headset and saw the adapter, and looked online for a replacement. Upon plugging it back in, the audio sounded extremely muffled and washed out. Im not sure what I did wrong to make it mess up like that as I've always taken good care of it, ive had it for about 2 years and its always just been chilling on my desk, but anywho I thought the cable just went bad and ordered a replacement. The replacement came, and the issue is still persistant, so I am not sure what the issue is I've tried multiple different headsets and the issue is not with the port, and I also tried it with my windows laptop and...
Apr 23, 2024
Oh, btw don't take blind tests too seriously. They're flawed in their own ways, and that's even more true when it comes to audio.
And you're correct that blind testing has it's flaws when it comes to audio, but that doesn't mean you should completely discount them. I feel that in this case, Tom's reasonably demonstrated that there is not a significant difference in quality between a good onboard audio chipset and other, more expensive options. And they were using an HD800 in this case, a headphone that costs over a thousand dollars and is considered to be super-high resolution.
Lastly, you're anecdote of plugging your headphones into different sources is FAR more useless than a blind test due to this little thing called the placebo effect, which happens to be even more powerful in the realm of audio than other areas of perception. Your mind is capable of manipulating what it hears into just about anything it wants. Perception is way more complicated that it looks as first glance. The brain isn't just some passive listener, it is an active signal processor.
At the end of the day, you should do what makes you happy. If that means spending lots of money on expensive audio equipment, that's fine, you will be rewarded whether or not there's an objective difference in sound quality. If there isn't, the placebo effect will make it sound better anyway, and in turn, make you happier. Me, personally, being frugal when possible makes me happy :)
And then "Due to time constraints, not all listeners tested all content."
With his blind testing, he made a lot of flaws. He's pretty much saying "I won't count this because it's obvious" or "I won't do that". And with some tests, all users got it correct. What matters the most is who and what is being tested. Someone with experience with listening to audio will be able to pick up the differences. Someone like my dad can't even tell the difference between $10 headphones and $100 headphones, unless you're telling me there's no difference between that either.
All I'm saying is don't be a fool to believe a hobbyist who writes an article who's opinion differs from the experts, and the majority of those who actually tried it.
I don't even think you read the full article. You read part of it, the parts you want to see, so you could convince yourself to believe you're getting the best. Can't we say you're doing the exact same? You don't even know who wrote it(It isn't Tom).
If anything, it makes the results more believable that they took the time to point out the flaws in their own study.
I read the entire article, however I'm really doubting that you did. The results overwhelmingly pointed to the conclusion that there is not a significant difference in quality/noise/whatever between the three sources. Hell, their conclusion page's title is literally "Anything Above $2 Buys More Features, Not Better Quality". That was their conclusion after analyzing their results and taking into account the flaws, which they talked about in detail.
I dunno why you so strongly want there to exist an objectively perceivable difference between sources. All that matters at the end of the day is the subjectively perceived difference. If you hear a difference, then you hear a difference, and no one can tell you otherwise. But never assume that the difference is anywhere besides within the confines of your own mind.
Do not underestimate the power of selective perception. I've witnessed it first hand in quite a few extreme cases. In one case, I picked up a container that had water in it, that I thought was lemonade. I took a few gulps, not noticing anything out of the ordinary. It wasn't until I saw the contents that I realized that I had drunk water, not lemonade. I tasted lemonade, not water. But I only had water.
If you truly believe something with all your heart, you will realize it.
If the brain can do that, it surely can manipulate the subtleties of music, which are FAR more subtle than the difference in taste between lemonade and water.
Anyway, I think it would be best to stop this conversation, as it doesn't really pertain to the product that's supposed to be discussed here. Though I wouldn't be opposed to continuing it elsewhere, if you'd really like to. Arguing is my pastime.