Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 67 conversations about:
keybers
194
Feb 23, 2016
bookmark_border
I'm just tired of most apparel manufacturers' assumption that women don't need pockets. I go places; I take stuff with me; it would be nice to have some sensitive stuff like credit cards as close to my body as possible. I would have needed precisely such an item for an upcoming trip.... well, not "precisely". A different one—one with a pocket. Was so excited to see the title image which features a chest pocket (better than sleeve pockets). Well, apparently I was deemed unworthy of features that are featured on title images. Second-rate stuff for people with, apparently, second-rate needs. So, passing on this one.
Feb 23, 2016
DannyMilks
4557
Feb 25, 2016
bookmark_border
keybersI totally agree with your statement @keybers. I am not happy when my wife and I are looking to buy the same clothing and find that the womens design is less functional and based more on aesthetics (lacking in pockets, different features, less practical sewing or baffles, and so on). On the other hand, sometimes I wish mens outdoor clothing was a little more flattering. No reason something can't function well AND look good. Zip off cargo pants are the biggest offender here, IMO.
Feb 25, 2016
View Full Discussion