Sennheiser PC37X randomly goes bad after disconnecting the cable ?
Greetings, Yesterday I was using my headset like normal with my macbook, just listening to music and on a call with people like usual, and the headset was perfectly fine. The stock wire that came with the headset is extremely long and yesterday it annoyed me very much that it kept getting tangled with itself, so I decided to see if the cable is replaceable. I pulled out the cable from the headset and saw the adapter, and looked online for a replacement. Upon plugging it back in, the audio sounded extremely muffled and washed out. Im not sure what I did wrong to make it mess up like that as I've always taken good care of it, ive had it for about 2 years and its always just been chilling on my desk, but anywho I thought the cable just went bad and ordered a replacement. The replacement came, and the issue is still persistant, so I am not sure what the issue is I've tried multiple different headsets and the issue is not with the port, and I also tried it with my windows laptop and...
Apr 23, 2024
They are entirely different sounding headphones (I have both Thinksound ON1 and ESW9a). See my comments further down comparing both.
So the Thinksound may or may not be a major upgrade for you depending on what you like (In fact, I've recently pulled my ESW9a's out recently, and actually am finding them a bit tame and lifeless. Not as engaging as I had recalled when I got them. But that may be a systems matching thing as my setup has changed since then).
That said, the E-MU Teak is supposed to be awesome (but again, not designed for portable use, like the Thinksound, so again different), so there's no fault to want to go for the E-MU Teak. I don't think you can lose, there.
No regrets here, these are easy to enjoy, and very much so. Not "analytical", but very "musical" I'm actually really surprised these get so little attention on discussions.
Better quality in bass, and sound stage than compared to something like ATH-M50x(used to own). I would imagine they sound rather different than the usual Audio Technica "house sound/tuning" the ESW9a may have.
I hear great things about the E-MU Teak... But I'm just here waiting for my TH-X00 Ebony to arrive!
Cheers.
Edit: The really thin ESW9a cable broke twice at the earcup, but the On2 cable is awesome - and detachable.
Many thanks for your assistance.
PS - Please, no more in car reviews!! ;)
The keywords "warm, relaxed, veiled" are a triple emphasis on a muted treble, never mind the "bleeding" part. That's not even mid-fi, it's lo-fi.
the emu teak is head and shoulders above the headphones we are talking about here. The emu teak is more resolving, more detailed, has better bass and treble extension, has better soundstage, has better transient response. You can email Tyll (the person you quoted above) and ask him if you'd like.
that's no slam on the on2, the on2 is drastically cheaper (the emu teak costs around $500-$600) and isn't portable. The emu teak is just a different class and category of headphone.
This is why people should stick to talking about things they've heard, because otherwise they end up putting out very bad information. This isn't a matter of you having a poor opinion, you don't even have an opinion because you've never heard what you're giving strong takes on.
Im sorry if this seems harsh, but people giving strong statements on stuff they've never even heard is one of my biggest pet peeves on this website.
Emu teak THD and impulse response:
I never questioned your general knowledge or intellIgence. I said you can't make statements like you did about headphones you've never even heard. That is the definition of ignorance. It's not that you're wrong, it's that you have absolutely no basis for making the statement you did because you have never even heard it. You're just guessing, and your guess turned out to be wrong.
It would be very different if you had heard the teak and said "I don't like it, I think the Esw9a and on2 sound better." I would strongly disagree with that opinion, but fine, people can disagree with how things sound.
What youre doing is just making opinions up out of whole cloth.
I dont understabd whats so complicated about you just admitting you've never heard it and thus admitting your opinion of its sound is worse than an opinion, that it's a wild guess you're making.
Innerfidelity backed up what you're saying? Ten times as much distortion in the bass and a 6dB valley in the treble and a retarded looking impulse response are backing up your claims that the esw9a is more "hi-fi"?
how do I also know that Tyll would never call the teak anything but hi-fi? Well because I've listened to those very headphones in the same room with him. Again, the Teaks are in a different class from the On2 and esw9a. Anybody who has listened to both will tell you that. This isn't a slam on the On2. Just pointing out that what you were saying when he asked about the teak was severely misinformed.
http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/survey-foster-443742-variants-subjective-listening-tests-denon-ah-d5000-massdrop-fostex-th#evfDjKGZfCOVJfTS.97
I invite people to read that review. And tell me that the portion on the Teak is Tyll saying it's Lo-Fi. He prefers it to the $2000 TH900 MkII and Massdrop's own THX00.
My original tone wasn't hostile. I called your statement ignorant, because that's what it was. You haven't heard the headphone, so any opinion you have on its quality is one of ignorance in a very literal sense. You couldn't possibly know what you're talking about, because you don't even have a basis for making that statement.
You don't even have an opinion on the Teak, you made a wild guess. It was a bad guess in my opinion, having owned the ESW9a, having spent dozens of hours with the Teak (and owning a very similar headphone, the THX00 with ebony cups) and having spent several hours with the On2.
I provided the graphs so this isn't just babbling. To me graphs aren't the be all and end all, but with the ESW9a, they show a pretty poor headphone by modern standards. It has all sorts of far less than optimal reflections (and thus the garbage impulse response) and has an outrageous amount (for an expensive headphone, which the ESW9a is) of distortion in the bass. at 50Hz it has 10 times as much distortion as the EMU Teak (which you call Lo-Fi based on never having heard it).
Then your, to be real, dishonest out of context quoting of Tyll was laughable as well. He freaking raved about the EMU Teak in the article you took the quote from. He told me personally he would have put it on his wall of fame if they had a US distributorship at the time instead of just massdrop or import. But somehow you pull one quote, out of context and call it "lo-fi" get real, bud.
you're declaring your own self the "winner" lol, yeah, the true sign of an actual winner is somebody who self-declares.
I also disagree with your definition of "hi-fi signature" as do the engineers at Sennheiser, Focal, Audeze, Mr. Speakers, AKG/Harman, etc.
People who design headphones and speakers don't view frequency response as what "hi-fi" is. Which, best I can tell, your definition of "hi-fi" is purely frequency response. People who design, and most professional reviewers, view "hi-fi" to be more about low distortion, clear transient response and transparency. Neutral-ish frequency response and sound stage might factor in, but nobody really agrees on the correct compensation curve.
Ridiculous. If your system sounds like what you hear live, then it's right.
When the head of Harman, and the guy who promoted the Harman Response curve was also president of the AES, Harman/AKG released the K812. Innerfidelity was not very kind to the K812. Just a classic example of "People who design headphones...."
" Oh yeah, distortion and all that "stuff". You're hilarious. " " Wow, are you ever the self-made "expert". Here's a hint, bud. "
That's without going even a bit back.
Perhaps instead of, supposedly, buying all those headphones, you should buy, oh, maybe... this?
https://www.amazon.co.uk/ATCHOO-Complete-Guide-Good-Manners/dp/0340945265/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1483119206&sr=8-2&keywords=manners
Edit: If you were not a troll, you'd stay on topic. But you don't, because you are.