Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
etrin
1
Jun 7, 2018
I was looking at this to use with a N 1080. I have looked a lot at 35 UW and 32 monitors and G-Sync is just too damn high. A LOT of people and reviews say this resolution at 32" just has one problem...desktop their description was just not as crisp, clear etc one even said down right fuzzy or out of focus because of low pixel density. This was a review on the LG 850 that people rave about. Whats your opinion for desktop as well as gamin.
ps does this monitor use pwm for backlight? If so I thought almost all manufactures quit using it.
Kujo
195
Aug 6, 2018
etrinI bought this monitor about five months ago, and I can attest that the desktop isn't ideal at this pixel density, but otherwise this monitor is pretty impressive. This monitor does NOT use PWM. Games look incredibly sharp and smooth at 1440p, and videos are just as stunning. If you're a content creator, graphic designer, or editing documents on the regular, there are a ton of better options out there, but for a gaming monitor with these specs, you can't beat it at this price point.
Poblopuablo
338
Aug 7, 2018
etrin32" 2560x1440 is ~92pixels per inch **(this monitor)**
27" 2560x1440 is ~108pixels per inch
While it may not sound like a lot it is slightly noticable.
For comparison:
32" ultrawide 3440x1440 is ~117pixels per inch
34" ultrawide 3440x1440 is ~110pixels per inch
24" 1920x1080 is ~92pixels per inch
23" 1920x1080 is ~96pixels per inch
22" 1920x1080 is ~100pixels per inch
21" 1920x1080 is ~105pixels per inch
Most common 1080p monitors are 23-24Inches and this is on par with the pixel density of those.
Trending Posts in Battlestations