Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 126 conversations about:
Thechansen
33
Mar 31, 2018
bookmark_border
As some one who cannot hear a difference with expensive DACs and solid state amps, but who has never heard balanced gear before: should I even bother looking into it?
Mar 31, 2018
jgp1212
291
Apr 3, 2018
bookmark_border
ThechansenYou should certainly give it a try.
I find that the extra power it gives at least reduces the likelihood of distortion. As well as giving a nice level of clarity.
Apr 3, 2018
WaydeR
56
Apr 23, 2018
bookmark_border
ThechansenNo. Balanced is for long cable runs, unless you're running lines across rooms you don't need balanced. People on this forum are talking about "noise", as in balanced has less noise... is noise, as in s/n even a problem balanced sets out to solve? I thought the only reason professional audio studios etc. use balanced is for signal strength and interference?
But for short runs, anything around 6-feet cables, there are no audible gains to be had from using balanced anything. It's only bragging rights, even if the only person you're bragging to is yourself. On-paper it looks interesting. But it's no better than the standard unbalanced headphone jack.
Apr 23, 2018
darwin
90
Apr 23, 2018
bookmark_border
WaydeRIncorrect of course. Another person who doesn't know what balanced is.
Apr 23, 2018
WaydeR
56
Jun 15, 2018
bookmark_border
darwinMaybe, there are definitely technical specifics that go much deeper than my own understanding. But I believe the current popularity of balanced in/out for headphone setups requiring only runs of cable are getting minimal, if any benefit. It looks good on-paper so, why not use it if available. But doubt the practical benefits to sound quality.
That said, I run risk of hypocrisy because I use a balanced-ready rig at home and exclusively use balanced on my Audeze LCD3s, I love it. But in this case balanced provides a valuable extra output when I'm switching between different headphones.
But in my own (unscientific) testing with friends, I have yet to meet anyone who can actually hear the difference between the balanced output or quarter-inch headphone jacks.
Like fancy cables, there are a lot of people project a quasi-religious faith that expensive peripherals included in their gear will bring significant gains in sound quality. I'm a skeptic.
It's not just me, Tom Nousaine was one of the great hi-fi writers from the pre-digital age who did a lot of interesting controlled tests on audiophiles, sound engineers and hobbyests alike. His A/B/X testing on variants of very high-end audio rigs were legendary. He basically concluded that audiophiles tend to overestimate improvements when "high-end" peripherals are added to a sound system.
One in particular test I found amusing was when he took two of the same Carver power amp, and on one of them he replaced the power LED indicator light, the standard was blue but on one of the amps he replaced it with a red LED. He asked a panel, that could only see the face of the two amps, to describe differences in sound between the two amps. The panel of audiophiles and hi-fi journalists and engineers included Bob Carver himself, designer of the amp being used in the test.
The audience claimed to hear distinct differences between the two amps that roughly corresponded to the colour of the LED. The red LED amp frequently described as warm, colourful. The blue - cool, analytical. The punchline being that they were the same amp!
He did many more of these controlled tests of psychoacoustics at a Michigan or Massachusetts audio club he belonged to.
I believe, as Nousaine did, that we project a lot of our perception of sound quality based on unconscious biases.
I'm not saying balanced is bad by any means, I just question whether you're getting any practical value from it on a very short run. But hey, if the option is available I think it's worth it - just cuz.
Jun 15, 2018
View Full Discussion
Related Posts
Trending Posts in Audiophile