Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions

Wrist Check

more_vert
Got to try on a Seamaster 300. I feel like it is a bit too big. Thoughts?
search
10
8
remove_red_eye
4.3K
Guydude
490

search
close
Vincent.H
1698
Feb 7, 2018
The '57 reissue LE of the Seamaster is 2 mm smaller in diameter (39 mm).
The new Railmaster might be around the same size (40 mm vs 41 of the Seamaster), but that '57 reissue version is 38 mm.
If those are all too large, vintage might be the way to go. There are plenty of older watches that advertise anti-magnetic that are around the 34-36 mm range.
Vincent.H
1698
Feb 7, 2018
The most important thing about size: does it bother you? If not, who cares? This hobby is all about what you like.
If you want our thoughts, can we get a shot from a bit further away? It's hard to tell relative size with such a closeup shot. Maybe a shot with your arm by your side?
Sizing is hard to tell from photos, it could look larger because of the angle/framing of the photo. Also, as @Vintage1982Benz said, there's ways to combat that with some strap trickery.
Guydude
490
Feb 7, 2018
The one I really want and might just have to save up more for is the 1957 Seamaster 300
Having never experienced this myself, this seems insane -
" The first time this happened to me was when I put my Speedmaster down by mistake on a cell phone case with a rare earth magnetic clasp. I knew what I'd done instantly and pulled the watch off, but it immediately started to run about 10 minutes fast per hour."
Beautiful watch! Lug to lug may be a little large, but it would trim down a bit if you put it on a strap and not a bracelet.
Related Posts
Trending Posts in More Community Picks