Jul 18, 20183145 views

Samsung QLED vs LG OLED

search
Howdy Everyone,
I wanted to create a space here on Massdrop for everyone to discuss the pro's and con's of both OLED tech and QLED tech. There have been many questions in TV drops so far about which technology is better and why. Feel free to post your thoughts or questions you might have about this here. Below is an overview from forbes on the 2018 QLED/OLED Tech to get you started. I would like to keep the thread focused on the 2018 models as there have been some enhancements made in both camps over the last year.
Cheers.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnarcher/2018/05/09/lg-oled-e8-vs-samsung-q9fn-clash-of-the-tv-titans/#53f4171558ac
thumb_up
BackBenchBat, Julio Pacheco, and 24 others
thumb_up26
34
remove_red_eye3.1K

Add a comment...
I believe OLED gets the nod here as QLED is really Samsung's Sudo-OLED. Truthfully, I couldn't justify the price of either, so I opted for a 65" LG in the 9000 range with an AppleTV 4K for the den. Very pleased so far...
search
Load 3 more comments
RayF
Your wall mounted TV is so much brighter than your desktop mac! Nice setup guy.
smallbit
Thanks! Tell the truth, I'm not sure that photo does either justice--the TV was in screen-saver mode and the Mac supposedly adjusts it's brightness level to the room's ambient light. That said, I'm not sure I'd like to be staring into the brightness of that 65" screen while typing this response to you ;- )
PLASMA the only way to watch
living fossil
I miss my plasma too. I had a Mitsubishi Diamond Series 50" Plasma. Sadly it would only produce 720p. Impossible to beat the color vibrancy and accuracy as well as the speed of top end plasma's which is equivalence of 600hz. Wish they would not have gone away....
Samsung made AND PATONED QLED/AMOLED/OLED sooo ......
Great

I feel Samsung LED is more better.

OLED definitely looks better but which technology is better depends on how you take care of your electronics. Burn in only happens if you are careless with your electronics.
rowdyic
careless how? any tips on maintenance or avoiding the burn in?
ogmiami136
Vary your content. If you play the same video game or watch the same cable news channel endlessly, OLED is not a good choice because persistent on-screen graphics or HUD elements can cause BI.
OLED has the best image quality. QLED colors looks fake.
QLED is the winner for me. I own an LG OLED. The one reason why OLED is not the winner in my book: burn-in and the way LG handles burn-in. Plain and simple.
LG OLED is thew superior technology. It may cost more but having viewed countless TV's while visiting the largest Tech Department store in Japan I can safely say OLED not QLED is the clear winner. (Easily 200)
Load 1 more comment
TheBlueTengu
Is it the clear winner in just image quality?
TheBlueTengu
Clear winner, except LED TV's are slightly brighter.
I have both samsung is the clear winner it is giving Dolby vision run for his money. Finally ssmsung figure it out what normal people like bright and rich color any most of the Androide people have samsung phone also. Olad nice and over price. Horrible web os.
QLED - insane color volume, banding issues, uniformity issues, viewing angle issues, way over-priced. OLED - the new plasma, blacker than a cave at midnight, will burn-in if you're blasting out all of the nits, prices falling. When I first saw a QLED TV I said "wow", when I first saw an OLED I was speechless.
Samsung has finally decided to get into the OLED game, but it will be a few years until they have a product. As you move from side to side on a QLED, the color of the picture fades dramatically, but it doesn't on a OLED. Add in Dolby Vision, and I couldn't pass up on the LG OLED 65". Also, there is a lot of content on Netflix with only Dolby Vision and not HDR.
I'd go with QLED for a few reasons, feel free to disagree; but I like the brightness and the colours of QLED. I also like that there's no burn in potential, and that they're a little cheaper. I do think that side by side, a QLED and OLED look pretty similar in quality, except for brightness and colour accuracy.
I strongly prefer my basement ceiling-mounted projector. I find a reflected image much more lifelike than an emitted image. My upstairs set is a Samsung plasma, which replaced my Panasonic plasma. My projector is much easier on my eyes.
CRT is the way of the fuuuUuuuuture
KM1337
So true! Real videophiles appreciate the buttery smoothness and warm glow that only tube TVs can deliver.
I would warn anyone considering an OLED to be extremely careful. I own a 2016 OLED C6. Thing was my pride and joy out of the box. I picked up a new 5th gen Apple TV with support for Dolby vision and use directv now for my cable provider. I had the tv and appletv setup properly, but I walked out of the room to do some work in the the office and when I came back the picture had frozen. i immediately turned it off and ran the clear panel noise. Didn’t fix it. Now for any gray or white scenes, which there are a lot of I’m now realizing, have a big banner ghost across the picture. It bothered me to the point the OLED is now in the bedroom and picked up a 900F. I love this sony, but man did that OLED ruin LED for me. The slightest blooming irritates me. It does get crazy bright and the picture quality is great. Just be careful if you must have the OLED. My bottom line would be to wait until they sort it out. Yes the PQ is mind blowing, but I don’t want to have to babysit my tv for fear my $2000-$3000 will spontaneously catch fire.
I've owned an LG OLED B6 for a couple of years - the B-series is the "entry level" LG OLED vs the E-series which has a built-in Harman/Kardon soundbar [or speaker system depending on the year; it looks like for the 2018 models the soundbar has been ditched for some speakers that don't sound all that great so that's quite disappointing]. OLED TVs are better suited for darker rooms and environments, as each individual pixel can turn on and off so there is no backlight behind the diode array. Therefore the maximum brightness of the TV is usually about half that of an equivalent LED TV, so in brighter environments the OLED's performance will suffer. However, because each pixel is capable of turning on and off it produces a contrast ratio that is essentially infinite. This is why OLED TVs are continually praised for how "inky" their blacks are, whereas a traditional LED TV is always going to have that backlight behind the diode array so it will never be able to recreate a "true" black color.
QLED is a marketing term more than anything else - the Samsung is still at heart an LED TV with an array of backlights. I will say that if you do a lot of FPS gaming the Samsung is probably the better choice; Samsung LED TVs have been best-in-class for gamers for a number of years. LG has made strides with a big firmware update for my 2016 TV and I'm sure the 2018 models have even more improvements, but it definitely isn't as good as an experience as on a Samsung LED TV.
Both are good choices, but the fact that the Q9FN doesn't support Dolby Vision would be a huge deal-breaker for me at that price point. The HDR format wars are just heating up, but the Dolby name has a whole lot of weight behind it and is being wholeheartedly embraced by studios, Netflix, etc. and I can't fathom spending $2700 for a TV that doesn't have this feature.
QLED is old tech. OLED panels are far superior in contrast, color rang , energy consumption , and much more. LED (including QLED) is the past. OLED (organic LEDs are the future , there is no backlight and each individual pixel can be controled and illuminated or shut off. Rather than say a back light controlling quadrants of pixels like in QLED.
dana.goldberg
It is the future, but right now is almost a 1000 dollar price premium on a tv. I don't think it's the future until you start seeing 50+in oled displays hit the under-1000-dollar price point. I think we still have another 3 or 4 years before they become mainstream, so it's not exactly a terrible time to buy a mid or mid-low priced QLED and wait for mainstream OLED displays.
PigmonkeY
Not to throw shade but this is a very general statement. What I mean by that is if you wait 3-7 years for OLED's or QLED's to be come mainstream and fully replace LED's that are on the market today and they are similar in price to what the LED's are today why do you think that would be? It would be because something better than OLED's or QLED's exist that has driven the price down on them and now that new technology is now the new premium standard.
My point is you can make your statement at any given time about any newer premium technology and it would always be true, and you would always be waiting for the prices to come down on premium tech but then hold out again as the latest and greatest tech seems so much better.
As far as pricing is concerned Massdrop is selling the LG 55" B7A OLED for $1299.99 which is an amazing deal and not that much more expensive than middle to high end LED models from Samsung or LG. https://www.massdrop.com/buy/lg-55-b7-oled-4k-hdr-smart-tv
I'll help get this started as I'm interested in some more of the technical aspects. At the dumb consumer level I've heard the main difference is QLED looks better in a bright room while OLED will look better in a dark environment when comparing the two. I can only assume there is a lot more to it than that ;)
Add a comment...