Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
nantipaneith
374
Mar 15, 2017
Ultra specialized lens
pantag
102
Mar 15, 2017
nantipaneithWhy? Just a wide prime.
nantipaneith
374
Mar 15, 2017
pantagA very expensive fast wide prime. Massdrop isn't the platform where professionals would buy such a professional, purpose-specific lens, and most professionals would have the sense to simply rent such an expensive and purpose-specific lens for the purpose/assignment at hand, unless their arsenal requires and justifies owning it. And few people would sensibly pay $1k for the occasional shot that requires this lens' faculties to be delivered, e.g.: wide angle bokeh shots, etc.
There are countless wide angle alternatives that are far more cost effective.
pantag
102
Mar 15, 2017
nantipaneith$1K (or $800 on sale) is not too much money for an awesome wide lens. Actually, this is Fuji's best X-line lens.
nantipaneith
374
Mar 15, 2017
pantagYou're right; it's an awesome wide lens, and the price is right. The justification for a random photography enthusiast (as most Massdrop shoppers qualify) for paying the price to own this lens is hard to find.
Larkhon
14
Mar 15, 2017
nantipaneithNot sure it is that specialized... 1.4 is not only useful for bokeh, it is an advantage for exposure too. You might take shots that would end up too dark or blurry with any other lens.
nantipaneith
374
Mar 15, 2017
LarkhonThats the last reason to invest $1k.
Larkhon
14
Mar 15, 2017
nantipaneithwell, it probably beats the wide angle bokeh reason you're talking about... seriously a company like Fuji doesn't have the same lens coverage as Canon, they wouldn't just go and make a lens for that specific use. They made a 16mm prime with f1.4 to justify its price and differentiate it self from the competition. And anyway, if you have a Fuji camera, your only other choices to shoot at 16mm are the 16-50, 10-24 or 16-55mm. Kit lens isn't in the same league, 10-24 has OIS but can we expect 3 stops all the time and finally 16-55mm might be on par with sharpness but is a lot heavier and 'slower' at f2.8. Just look at dpreview forums and tell me the photo enthusiast won't spend $1k on that kind of lens...
nantipaneith
374
Mar 15, 2017
LarkhonI'm not convinced that this lens is a reasonable $1k alternative to the ones you mentioned.
nantipaneith
374
Mar 21, 2017
LarkhonSeems I was correct; nobody is buying into this drop.
Larkhon
14
Mar 21, 2017
nantipaneithNobody buying into this drop has nothing to do with how specialized or not this lens might be. This drop is only $60 cheaper than MSRP, it is ridiculous. As I mentioned earlier I can find the lens in my local shop (ok, that is in Switzerland) for $868 tax included, normal price, no rebate or anything. I would assume one could easily get $100 during sales or Fuji mail-in rebates. So in the end, the drop doesn't sell because the drop is not good enough...
nantipaneith
374
Mar 21, 2017
LarkhonLike I originally said, this drop isn't selling because nobody on Massdrop is going to be buying such a lens at such a price.
By the way, I'm also from Switzerland.
Larkhon
14
Mar 21, 2017
nantipaneithI can't disagree... I believe you would find people to buy it at $800-850 because it is wide, one of the sharpest fuji lens, opens at 1.4, etc... and the alternatives are not that many.
If they made a Fuji 16mm f2.8 it would probably be $500-ish and more interesting to most, but there will be more competition from other mirrorless offers, and less profit for Fuji of course.