Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 742 conversations about:
lohkhaiping
2
Feb 18, 2017
bookmark_border
arghhhh. i am still contemplating whether to keep glycine goldeneye or not.
this model seems like post invicta model.
Feb 18, 2017
K-Man
219
Feb 18, 2017
bookmark_border
lohkhaipingI really don't think it is yet Lohk... the changes made to the dial on the combat Sub was already in play before the sale to Invicta. Probably the last remnant of the last Pre-Invicta batch (just guessing).
Feb 18, 2017
Cotw
9
Feb 18, 2017
bookmark_border
lohkhaipingThe Golden Eye was released in 2012. Invicta bought Glycine last year, So nope, Invicta had nothing to do with it.
Feb 18, 2017
K-Man
219
Feb 18, 2017
bookmark_border
CotwNo he meant new Golden Eye batch under Invicta ownership and influenc.
Feb 18, 2017
michaelbooherattorney
13
Feb 18, 2017
bookmark_border
K-ManIf the Invicta people have any sense, they will not mess with the Glycine image or product line. Just keep it classy and as their premium line. With a little work, and maybe an upgraded movement, they could give Tag and Omega a run for their money.
Feb 18, 2017
dleblanc
246
Feb 19, 2017
bookmark_border
michaelbooherattorneyIt's the post-invicta, logo is different, box outline around the date is a bit cheesier and typeface isn't as nice.
I'm still jumping in because I think it's beautiful anyways
http://forums.watchuseek.com/f18/did-they-update-glycine-combat-sub-recently-2911354-2.html
Feb 19, 2017
K-Man
219
Feb 19, 2017
bookmark_border
dleblancNow there's always a possibility that it could be Invicta era stock but know that the posts in the link you provided is originally dated Feb of LAST year.  Way before the sale to Invicta was finalized and announced.   
Feb 19, 2017
michaelbooherattorney
13
Feb 19, 2017
bookmark_border
dleblancI've read a ot of comments, both here and elsewhere, about the changes in the logo, etc. It's a lot of bitching about some very minor changes, if you ask me. It's a great looking watch, and a superb value for this price. Anybody who is having a hissy over the change in the "crown" logo needs to turn in their man card.
Feb 19, 2017
SpiritOne
719
Feb 19, 2017
bookmark_border
michaelbooherattorneyEh, there's also the mismatched logo on the crown and dial.......
I don't know if you've ever spent time in a woodshop but attention to detail is what differentiates good from shoddy workmanship.
That said I prefer the old logo, but can live w/ the new logo.
Feb 19, 2017
michaelbooherattorney
13
Feb 19, 2017
bookmark_border
SpiritOneTh pictures ive seen appear to show the updated logo on both the face and the crown, if Im seeing correctly. We'll see.
Feb 19, 2017
View Full Discussion