Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 35 conversations about:
crafty35a
61
May 27, 2016
bookmark_border
I always assumed there was a reason that shoe trees are typically unfinished wood. Wouldn't the glossy coating on these affect the ability of the wood to wick moisture/odor from the shoes?
May 27, 2016
Epos7
38
May 27, 2016
bookmark_border
crafty35aMy thoughts exactly.
May 27, 2016
KentWang
372
Kent Wang
May 27, 2016
bookmark_border
crafty35aThe moisture wicking effect of unfinished shoe trees is over-exaggerated. My shoes are bone dry the morning after I put in the shoe trees, with both finished and unfinished shoe trees. A few hours difference doesn't matter. If you're truly concerned about this, then the matte finish is more moisture absorbent than the glossy finish.
Many high end makers like Gaziano & Girling ($1000+ retail shoes) use finished hardwood shoe trees.
May 27, 2016
IanAnderson
2590
May 27, 2016
bookmark_border
KentWangI was just going to say this but KW said it much better than I could have.
May 27, 2016
loxo
6
May 31, 2016
bookmark_border
crafty35aIf wood has a wicking" effect I doubt it is significant otherwise people wouldn't make boats out of it. Realistically, evaporation is doing the work to dissipate moisture.
May 31, 2016
ZZ_UPenn
257
May 31, 2016
bookmark_border
loxoSo do you think shoe trees are more for keeping the shape of the shoes (preventing creases), rather than absorbing moisture?
May 31, 2016
View Full Discussion