Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 8 conversations about:
fakuryu
13
May 17, 2017
bookmark_border
Somewhat unbelievable that no one is taking advantage of this! The KP is the best APSC DSLR in the market right now in terms of lowlight capability and image quality, plus that DA25 f2.8 Macro Limited is so sharp and has character.
May 17, 2017
mass_sean
67
May 18, 2017
bookmark_border
fakuryuIt makes for a good starter camera too. I like how one of the User Modes is Manual Lens which eliminates some of the menu drilling you'd have to do when attaching a manual lens. And, as I mentioned in a previous post, The additional bracketing modes can also be useful in beginner/intermediate stage.
search
May 18, 2017
Party_Hard
0
Feb 7, 2019
bookmark_border
fakuryu>The KP is the best APSC DSLR in the market right now in terms of lowlight capability  This is simply not true. High ISO number does not cause great image quality.
Feb 7, 2019
fakuryu
13
Feb 13, 2019
bookmark_border
Party_HardIts not about the high ISO, the KP's output is simply cleaner at any equivalent ISO (APSC) because it has a built in Image Acceleration unit. Even at a modest ISO1600 shows better detail than its peers and is already almost or is also matching a FF camera. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=pentax_kp&attr13_1=sony_a6300&attr13_2=sony_a7ii&attr13_3=fujifilm_xt3&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=1600&attr16_1=1600&attr16_2=1600&attr16_3=1600&attr171_1=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.8970131200246877&y=0.18439830804576898


Feb 13, 2019
Party_Hard
0
Feb 25, 2019
bookmark_border
fakuryu"built in Image Acceleration uni" is a name of way of implementing the technology (digital noise reduction) known for decades. Typically it is done on the main processor and was already used since K10D and by other OEMs as well but Pentax decided to make it a different chip. There are three problems with this chip:
  • it does nothing what can't be done with raw file developer. Specifically, it seems to apply mostly colour noise reduction as Fujifilm does for years already and Fujifilm does it even more aggressively.
  • it cannot be disabled and it's effect cannot be (easily) reversed
  • it reduces image detail (in this case: only slightly) as ANY existing random noise reduction algorithm
Here is comparison between K-1 which does not have it and K-1 II which has similar chip. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=pentax_k1&attr13_1=pentax_k1ii&attr13_2=sony_a7ii&attr13_3=fujifilm_xt3&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=1600&attr16_1=1600&attr16_2=1600&attr16_3=1600&attr126_0=1&attr126_1=1&attr171_1=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=-0.31430476455080064&y=0.6849277254716402 Look at the purple spool. You can see that K-1 has more noise and slightly better detail. Then look at how D7200 has less colour noise (tens of pixels large green and purple blobs in this case) than KP even without noise reduction. https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/image-comparison/fullscreen?attr18=daylight&attr13_0=nikon_d7200&attr13_1=pentax_kp&attr13_2=pentax_kp&attr13_3=fujifilm_xt3&attr15_0=raw&attr15_1=raw&attr15_2=raw&attr15_3=raw&attr16_0=3200&attr16_1=3200&attr16_2=3200&attr16_3=3200&attr126_0=1&attr126_1=1&attr171_1=1&normalization=full&widget=1&x=0.34696618373376736&y=-0.08711197526986966


(Edited)
Feb 25, 2019
View Full Discussion