Support for Alternative Layouts
This is a summary of how alternative layouts have been supported by kits such as Colevrak and Homing. It is not a discussion of alt layout performance and development, but if that interests you I highly recommend starting with Pascal Getreuer’s A guide to alt keyboard layouts (why, how, which one?). It’s a concise and comprehensive overview with links to some great sites that go deeper. He also has a separate Links about keyboards page. The Keyboard layouts doc he recommends explains layout goals and metrics in detail, summarizing the alt layouts discussed here as well as more than one hundred others. Sculpted-profile The majority of custom keycap sets are sculpted-profile (Cherry, SA, MT3, KAT, etc. - more on profiles generally here) so let’s start there. Because each row has a unique keycap shape, alt layouts require a unique keycap for each legend that moves off its QWERTY row. At first there were two The Dvorak layout was patented in 1936 by August Dvorak & William L....
Apr 23, 2024
Making your own layout is essential to using a Planck! It is very easy to do and very well documented (but if you need help I'm always around to lend a hand!)
This is the layout I use (below). It looks chaotic, but it is easy for me to remember so it works. One thing I've found that helps me a lot is to have A) FN layer with a numpad layout (because I suck at hitting numbers on top row without legends) and B) using a number row that is Shift+"#", meaning I can hit the number row symbols without having to do FN+Shift+"#". The duplicates on my FN1: layer (such as [ ] { }) are the same. One of the pairs is already SHIFT+[ so I can access the symbols without the need to hit 3 keys at once.
I never get a layout right the first go, so I'd recommend playing with it until it feels natural! I know legends helped me a lot too, even though I can tough type it just makes the transition so much easier and makes my overall speed reach normal levels very quickly. I cant recommend this keyboard enough!!!!
Base:
Anyone want to fill me in? They look cool and all but it seems to me that a tenkeyless would be the best for this sort of "space conscious" setup.
Some reasons for me about Planck: 1. All of the reason above 2. My hand is moving less than on 60% because the keys I can access are already around my resting finger 3. Having a ortholinear layout helps my mind and hand coordination better, as the location of each key is far more rational than standard staggered one (like, where is X located in staggered? below S or below D? in planck I can easily said it is below S)
While I still use larger format keyboards at home, I do travel everywhere with a Planck.
I use my mechanical board for gaming mostly and type on my laptop, so the thought of using a mech board with a tiny space seems tricky in my personal experience even though I know other people have differennt use cases.
Switching to the Planck would be easier to use if you already know proper touch typing. I can definitely see how it would be very difficult if you are already in the habit of using odd fingers for certain keys.
I don't know my exact typing speed but I do know it hasn't changed and if anything has gotten faster. Most certainly not as fast as if I were proficient at the 'proper' typing technique.