Click to view our Accessibility Statement or contact us with accessibility-related questions
Showing 1 of 112 conversations about:
seedeh
6
Aug 11, 2017
bookmark_border
I wouldn't recommend buying this. The new one is updated with Invicta, a much cheaper brand, and it reflects on the updated watch. Take a look at the classic one and it's quality, the Invicta ones are not so much. It's worth the 50 extra dollars for the original one on like jomashop or something.
Aug 11, 2017
boozed
297
Aug 12, 2017
bookmark_border
seedehHow can you judge quality just from these photos?
Aug 12, 2017
seedeh
6
Aug 12, 2017
bookmark_border
boozedThey're the newer version, which are lesser quality. I'm not judging quality based on pictures, I'm just recognizing the quality of the watches.
Aug 12, 2017
Virgule
343
Aug 12, 2017
bookmark_border
seedehInvicta is not designing or manufacturing Glycine watches. They're distributing them.
Aug 12, 2017
seedeh
6
Aug 18, 2017
bookmark_border
VirguleThey still downgraded this version of the watch.
Aug 18, 2017
TigerUK
296
Nov 22, 2017
bookmark_border
Virgulethey will be in charge of setting budgets on the manufacturing and that will bring down cost.
Nov 22, 2017
Virgule
343
Nov 22, 2017
bookmark_border
TigerUKI'd be curious to read about this if you have a source.
Nov 22, 2017
ckm5
210
Jun 24, 2018
bookmark_border
seedehI totally agree - I bought a Combat Sub a few months ago and it's nowhere near the quality of my older Combat 6. So bad I thought of returning it, but I gave it some wrist time to see if it was just me. Nope, it's on par with a cheaper Invicta - even Invicta's higher end models are better.
Jun 24, 2018
View Full Discussion