In my opinion, camo doesn't make sense for many items, especially something small that will be hidden in a pocket. If it's not part of an effort to camouflage one's external appearance, then camo is usually a bad idea, especially for a small item like this that can easily be dropped or slip off one's gear and onto the ground where it won't be noticed. Having gone through a early period of losing several folding knives that didn't have pocket clips (fortunately all cheap), I've learned to be more careful. Contrasting color helps in this regard! Of course there's always the cool factor of having a camo coated item, but don't plan on keeping it forever. I just don't think that cool factor is worth the bad feeling one might have later when losing a nice EDC item. This is just my sense of it, but perhaps there are other valid perspectives . . . .
Just a huge flag, Massdrop has a lousy history of special print Victorinox knives. Bought one with a VERY crooked and poor quality print and was not able to return it for a refund. Would avoid.
AthtelNot well, and I'll tell you why I know this: because when Navy personnel fell into the water whilst wearing their spiffy new "Navy camo" BDUs, which the senior Naval commanders had INSISTED their branch ought to get since the other three got new camo patterns for THEIR fatigues, said overboard sailors were, much, much more difficult to find in the water, thanks to their newfound ability to blend in with the "terrain". Apparently, the traditional all-white sailor's served more of a purpose than just keeping bell-botton trousers in existence. I have no idea how many people they lost thanks to the top brass not wanting to be the only debutants at the ball without new finery, but it was enough that "Navy camo" has been discontinued; sailors were ordered some time ago to exchange every piece of clothing with the camo pattern on it.
At least the Air Force personnel were unlikely to be fatally overlooked by search and rescue because their blue camo caused them to blend into the sky.