Stone Series by Yaxell Paring & Utility Knife Set

Name: Stone Series by Yaxell Paring & Utility Knife Set
Brand: Curtis Stone
SKU: stone-series-paring-and-utility-knife-set
Price: 92 USD
Availability: OutOfStock
Rating: 5 (3 reviews)

Where's the price?

To negotiate the best possible price for our customers, we agree to hide prices prior to logging in.

111 requests

Product Description

Designed by chef and author Curtis Stone, this pair of knives has you covered for a variety of kitchen tasks. Each knife is made from three-layer Japanese steel with a VG-10 core—a Japanese steel known for its edge retention and resistance to corrosion Read More

Customer Reviews

5.0

(3 reviews)

(3)

(0)

Images

Sort by: Top Reviews

Rochsolid

May 2, 2018

Verified Buyer

These knives are very comfortable to use and cut well. They're very beautiful. I find them most useful for slicing/dicing vegetables or smaller portions of meat on a cutting board, which they accomplish with very little pressure in addition to their own weight. I have other knives for that purpose but tend to reach for these. They're a little large and scary for paring. My only knock is that the metallic sound they make (when they touch a plate or the counter) sounds tinny, but that's hardly a criticism of their worth as knives.

Was this helpful?

GEMarcus

Mar 6, 2019

Verified Buyer

First rate blades - very well crafted, excellent materials and construction. Like the aesthetic and feel of the knives in the hand.

Was this helpful?

Relaxin

Keyboard Club Member

Apr 10, 2020

Verified Buyer

Amazing quality for a stainless knife.

This review also goes for the chef Knife and the carving knives of the same series. Same steel, different shapes, same awesome. The steel used in this knife is much better than I was expecting. Takes and edge and does a great job of keeping that edge. The knife has a really nice heft to it so don't expect a super light knife. The shiny surface will get cloudy if you use abrasive sponges, though. Overall I'm very impressed.

Was this helpful?

Vote